The new, younger Ayatollah Khamenei – who may have been wounded in the early days of US-Israeli strikes, hasn’t been seen in any public way, not even on TV, throughout the war. There have not so much as been any official recent images of him circulated.

But Mojtaba Khamenei has apparently been issuing some limited written statements, mainly encouraging foreign proxies in their joining the war against US and Israeli forces in the region. State media has indicated he’s not making public appearances given the ongoing relentless bombing campaign and the Islamic Republic’s wartime footing.

via PressTV

After a long period of relative silence, a message from Khamenei was publicized on Monday. In the message attributed to him, he “expressed his appreciation to the supreme religious authority (in Iraq) and the people of Iraq for their clear stance against aggression against Iran and their support for our country,” Iran’s ISNA news agency said, referring to the Iraq-based Grand Ayatollah Ali Sistani. Sistani is based in Iraq and has long been a highly revered Shia cleric in the region.

The 56-year old Khamenei has on Wednesday apparently broken his silence again, this time praising Hezbollah for joining the war against Israel. Hezbollah has been launching hundreds of rockets on northern and central Israel, amid an emerging ground campaign in southern Lebanon, also as Israel bombs Beirut from the air.

In the new words carried by Iranian state media, he praised Hezbollah for its “perseverance, steadfastness and patience” against “the most ruthless enemies of the Islamic world.”

Meanwhile, the CIA and Mossad are said to be trying to uncover Mojtaba Khamenei’s whereabouts and status. His 86-year old father did not appear to have been in hiding at all when he was slain by airstrike on the very first day of Operation Epic Fury.

The most likely explanation could be that the younger Khamenei is directing the war from a much more secure and hidden setting, for example a deep underground bunker – or in a remote part of the country. 

Iran’s Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, via AFP

But some analysts have questioned why he wouldn’t make a video address, even if pre-recorded, offering to the world proof that he is a alive and is running the country and war. As for the most visible day-to-day leader, this is parliament speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf.

Authored by Steve Watson via Modernity.news,

Europe is literally paying Indians hundreds of euros a month to “study” while its own students can’t afford rent and are drowning in debt.

In a now-viral video, an Indian student in Europe boasts about the arrangement. He explains how the EU provides him with 1400 euros every single month that covers rent, travel, and meals, with zero student debt, while he still saves 600 euros every single month. 

He walks through what he calls “elite scholarship secrets,” noting that a simple bachelor’s degree, a valid passport, and basic English proficiency suffice — adding that “IELTS is not always mandatory” and a certificate from some random school abroad will do.

europe literally paying Indians 1400 euro a month to “study” here while our own students can’t afford rent and are drowning in debt.

this guy is literally bragging about scamming the system with a degree that’s worth less than a high school diploma in the west.

total subversion… pic.twitter.com/IA0yxdlaaY

— pallasmaxxer (@pallasmaxxer) March 30, 2026

The poster highlighted the post with clear frustration: “literally bragging about scamming the system with a degree that’s worth less than a high school diploma in the west… total subversion of our education system and you are the one footing the bill. Peak comedy.”

In follow-ups, the same account pointed out that the individual admits “you don’t need to be a topper to get 1400 euro a month… a 75% gpa from a third world uni — literally a mediocre 6.5/10 here… you don’t even need a real English test.”

This reflects a broader pattern visible online where some Indians treat European scholarships and student visas as an easy backdoor. 

Other posts have referenced credential issues in India, including claims that one can simply buy degrees and credentials in India and use them to secure educational places in Europe with a visa.

The same dynamic has played out for years in the UK. Former universities minister Jo Johnson previously slammed the high drop-out rates among Indian and Bangladeshi students — the highest among international cohorts — with concerns that “one in four” drop out to take up jobs while remaining on student visas.

? ICYMI

‘1 in 4 students from India and Bangladesh drop out of their UK university course. So, come over here, bring your dependents, then just drop out and crack on with your life.’@PatrickChristys asks if we should impose an ‘absolute cap’ on immigration. pic.twitter.com/aGfgk1xOqU

— GB News (@GBNEWS) December 15, 2023

He called for stricter rules requiring overseas students to prove they can support themselves for the full duration of their course to prevent abuse.

More recently, UK Indo-Pacific Minister Seema Malhotra flagged a surge in student asylum claims as clear “visa abuse.” She stated: “We’ve seen visa abuse in the case of legal routes, where people have gone legally and then sought to overstay when their visas weren’t extended.”

UK universities are shutting out applicants from Pakistan and Bangladesh because of concerns over visa abuse and tougher Home Office rules https://t.co/AbCtu4C4XD pic.twitter.com/JP9PwOosBR

— Financial Times (@FT) December 4, 2025

Official figures showed around 16,000 international students applied for asylum last year after completing courses, with another 14,800 in the first half of 2025. 

Completely agree with @ZiaYusufUK

Shabana Mahmood has suspended student visas for four countries. They made up 3,000 out of the 400,000 student visas last year.

The student visas from Bangladesh are x3 higher, Pakistan and Nigeria x10 higher but they’re not on the list. A sham. pic.twitter.com/MNDKJfxbUA

— Chris Rose (@ArchRose90) March 4, 2026

Indian student numbers to the UK have already fallen amid tighter controls.

UK minister flags visa ‘abuse’ as student asylum claims surge https://t.co/Wqd1i1E0Ho

— BBC News (UK) (@BBCNews) November 25, 2025

‘We should change the law to say if you come in on a student or tourist visa, you cannot seek asylum!’

Former Conservative MP Louise Mensch reacts to new reports into how Britain’s visa system is being gamed, with Pakistanis making up a disproportionate number of cases. pic.twitter.com/q5bXTYrF51

— GB News (@GBNEWS) November 23, 2025

Reform leader Nigel Farage has repeatedly called out the absurdity of the student visa route, including how it has allowed foreign students to bring large numbers of dependents.

In one exchange, he put it plainly: “If you come to university in Britain, you can’t just bring your Mum with you.” 

He highlighted the previous policy that saw 460,000 study visas issued in 2023 along with 144,000 dependents, describing it as “absolutely batty” and noting that universities had become “drunk on foreign money.” 

Farage argued this setup does little to benefit British students and contributes heavily to net migration figures.

Farage has repeatedly argued that the economic case for mass migration has collapsed, pointing out how it drags down GDP per capita and leaves average Britons poorer despite headline growth figures.

This fits a wider picture. A report from the Centre for Migration Control revealed that 1.6 million migrants in the UK are unemployed or economically inactive, costing taxpayers £8.5 billion a year — a figure that does not even include asylum accommodation or foreign student subsidies.

The analysis described the situation as “the very definition of a Ponzi scheme.” 

Europe and the UK have spent years importing large numbers of students under the banner of “excellence” and economic benefit. Instead, taxpayers subsidize stipends and visas while native young people struggle with debt and housing costs. 

When the arrivals treat the system as a joke — openly bragging about minimal effort for maximum payout — and even bring extended family on the back of student visas, the subversion becomes impossible to ignore.

The response must be straightforward: close the loopholes, enforce real standards, deport those gaming the rules, and put citizens first. Continuing the current approach only accelerates the burden on working people and erodes trust in institutions.

Your support is crucial in helping us defeat mass censorship. Please consider donating via Locals or check out our unique merch. Follow us on X @ModernityNews.

Authored by Duggan Flanakin via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

The rapid evolution of U.S. national security strategy in the Western Hemisphere has taken a decisive turn with the launch of the Shield of the Americas—a multinational initiative that is already reshaping diplomatic, military, and law enforcement cooperation across the region.

Soldiers stand guard during a visit of special envoy of the U.S. Shield of the Americas Program Kristi Noem outside the Carondelet Palace in Quito, Ecuador, on March 25, 2026. Rodrigo Buendia/AFP via Getty Images

The importance of this initiative has come into sharper focus in recent weeks, following former Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem’s reassignment as special envoy and her engagements with Ecuadorian leadership, as well as meetings with leaders across Latin America.

Far from a symbolic gesture, the Shield of the Americas represents a strategic recalibration grounded in urgent realities: transnational crime, migration pressures at their origin, and in the process, intensifying geopolitical ’soft power’ competition.

But at its core, the Shield of the Americas is a coordinated security coalition designed to combat drug cartels, disrupt trafficking networks, and address illegal migration through joint intelligence and military cooperation. Its formation in March 2026 brought together more than a dozen nations from Latin America and the Caribbean, signaling a renewed emphasis on hemispheric alignment, at a time when these threats have become transnational to an unprecedented degree.

The timing is not coincidental. The United States continues to face unprecedented challenges tied to fentanyl and synthetic opioid trafficking—much of it linked to cartel networks operating across borders. These organizations are no longer localized criminal enterprises; they are sophisticated, multi-billion-dollar operations with global reach.

The Shield’s emphasis on intelligence sharing and coordinated enforcement acknowledges a simple truth: no single country can address this threat alone.

This is where Noem’s visit becomes especially significant.

Ecuador, her final stop, has emerged as a frontline state in the fight against narcotrafficking, with its geographic position making it a key transit hub for drugs moving from South America to North American and European markets. Recent joint U.S.-Ecuador operations underscore both the urgency of the challenge and the necessity of partnership.

In turn, the Shield provides the institutional framework to scale such cooperation—transforming ad hoc engagements into sustained, strategic collaboration.

Critically, the initiative also reflects a broader geopolitical imperative. The Western Hemisphere is increasingly contested terrain, with China expanding its economic and political influence through infrastructure investments, telecommunications, and resource extraction. The Shield of the Americas explicitly seeks to counter this influence by strengthening alliances and reinforcing U.S. leadership in the region.

In this sense, the initiative is not only about security—it is about shaping the future alignment of the Americas in a rapidly evolving global order.

Skeptics have raised concerns about the militarized aspects of the Shield, noting that its emphasis on coordinated military action represents a departure from more traditional approaches centered on law enforcement. Yet this critique overlooks the scale and sophistication of the threat landscape.

Cartels today operate with capabilities that rival those of insurgent groups, leveraging advanced technology, financial networks, and paramilitary tactics. Addressing such threats requires a commensurate response.

Moreover, the Shield is not solely a military construct. It is a platform for comprehensive engagement—encompassing intelligence sharing, economic cooperation, and governance initiatives. By aligning participating countries around shared objectives, it creates the conditions for more effective, coordinated action across multiple domains.

Noem’s role as special envoy is central to this effort. Her mandate is not merely diplomatic; it is operational, tasked with translating high-level agreements into actionable partnerships on the ground. Her track record has her primed for success. And this week, her engagement with Ecuadorian leadership exemplified this approach, reinforcing bilateral ties while advancing the broader objectives of the coalition.

Ultimately, the importance of the Shield of the Americas lies in its recognition of interconnected realities. Drug trafficking fuels migration; migration strains border systems; geopolitical competition exploits instability. Addressing these challenges in isolation is no longer viable.

The Shield offers a model rooted in collective action, shared responsibility, and strategic alignment. In doing so, it marks a significant evolution in U.S. foreign policy toward the region, one that acknowledges both the risks and the opportunities of a more integrated hemispheric approach.

As Noem’s visit demonstrates, the success of this initiative will depend not on rhetoric, but on execution.

If the Shield can translate its ambitious vision into tangible results—disrupting cartels, strengthening partnerships, and stabilizing key regions—it may well prove to be one of the most consequential security initiatives in the Americas in decades.

Views expressed in this article are opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Epoch Times or ZeroHedge.

Authored by Aamir Khollam via Interesting Engineering,

China has pushed further into heavy unmanned aviation with the first flight of the Changying-8 (CY-8), which it claims is the world’s heaviest cargo drone.

China’s Changying-8 (CY-8) cargo drone.

The aircraft combines high payload capacity with short-runway performance, targeting logistics operations across remote, high-altitude, and island regions.

The newly tested Changying-8 (CY-8) blends high payload capacity with short runway performance, signaling a push toward flexible, all-terrain aerial supply systems.

The aircraft completed its first test flight on Tuesday in Zhengzhou, located in central China’s Henan province.

It lifted off after a short ground run of 280 meters and stayed airborne for about 30 minutes.

According to state broadcaster CCTV, engineers used the flight to verify key onboard systems, including avionics, propulsion, and intelligent flight controls.

Built for heavy payloads

The CY-8 stands out for its size and carrying capability. It reaches a maximum take-off weight of 7 tonnes. The drone itself weighs 3.5 tonnes and can carry an equal load.

Its airframe stretches 17 meters long with a wingspan of 25 meters. Engineers designed a fully enclosed cargo bay with a volume of 18 cubic meters.

The aircraft includes both front and rear access doors, allowing faster turnaround during loading and unloading operations.

CCTV described the platform as an “unmanned aerial heavy truck.” The drone relies on twin turboprop engines and supports short take-off and landing operations.

This design allows it to operate on basic runways with limited infrastructure.

“This cargo drone is highly adaptable to its environment, uses twin turboprop engines, and has the ability to take off and land on simple runways in high-altitude areas, as well as perform short take-offs and landings,” said Cai Hangqing, chairman of Beijing Northern Changying UAV Technology, as reported by SCMP.

Developers built the CY-8 to support both civilian and military roles. The drone can switch payload configurations quickly, making it suitable for a wide range of missions.

CCTV reported that operators can deploy it for emergency communications, weather modification, and electronic reconnaissance.

It can also support logistics, disaster relief, and supply delivery in difficult terrain.

The drone’s design focuses heavily on high-altitude performance.

It can operate in regions such as the Tibetan Plateau, where elevations range between 4,000 and 5,000 meters.

Engineers also optimized it for island operations, enabling use on short and simple airstrips.

The CY-8 requires less than 500 meters for take-off and landing.

It also offers a range of more than 1,850 miles, extending its operational reach across remote or strategically sensitive areas.

Expanding global competition

China’s latest drone arrives as competition intensifies in the heavy cargo UAV segment.

Beijing continues to invest in uncrewed systems capable of operating in extreme environments.

Other Chinese projects are already in progress. Air White Whale is developing the W5000, a larger 10-tonne-class cargo drone.

A scaled prototype recently completed its maiden flight.

China has also tested a heavy-lift unmanned helicopter, the Boying T1400. That platform targets operations from mountainous regions to maritime zones.

The United States is advancing similar systems.

California-based Sabrewing developed the RH-1-A Rhaegal cargo drone, which completed its first hover flight in 2022.

A larger variant is expected to reach a maximum take-off weight of 6.25 tonnes.

Unlike the CY-8, Sabrewing’s design uses vertical take-off and landing. This removes the need for runways and enables operations in confined spaces.

The company has already secured collaborative orders from the US Air Force.

China plans to continue flight testing of the CY-8. The developer aims to move toward full-scale production before the end of the year.

Colonial Pipeline’s Line 1, the largest U.S. gasoline pipeline running from Houston toward the East Coast, has halted operations after a third-party work crew damaged a section of the line in Georgia.

Bloomberg reported that the line stopped shipping fuel after the damage occurred on Tuesday in Paulding County, Georgia.

“Line 1 is out of service while our team coordinates response and repair efforts,” Colonial said in a statement cited by the outlet.

The outage hits a critical fuel artery that carries about 1.5 million barrels per day of gasoline from Houston to North Carolina, supplying an East Coast market that remains heavily dependent on pipeline deliveries due to limited local refining capacity.

While the rest of Colonial’s pipeline system remains operational, any prolonged shutdown risks further tightening fuel supplies at a time when the war in Iran has pushed the U.S. national average price for regular gasoline to the politically sensitive level of $4 per gallon.

Let’s remind readers that the 380,000-barrel-per-day Port Arthur, Texas, Valero refinery experienced an explosion last week at its 47,000-bpd unit 243 diesel hydrotreater. The good news is that the refinery has since restarted operations. 

First a refinery, now a pipeline. One has to wonder whether these “industrial accidents” are early signs of sabotage, particularly at a time when energy infrastructure is being destroyed across Russia, Ukraine, and the Middle East.

Brookfield Infrastructure owned Colonial pipeline down

Is it me or are we seeing tit for tat moves against energy infrastructure? First refineries, now a pipeline. pic.twitter.com/X0B6yyMs68

— Arthur Vandelay (@ArturoVandelayI) April 1, 2026

Certainly lots of questions here. 

Authored by Jacob Burg via The Epoch Times,

Four U.S. senators from both sides of the aisle are planning to visit Taiwan, Japan, and South Korea within the coming days to strengthen U.S. alliances that they see as critical to challenging China’s sphere of influence.

Sen. Jeanne Shaheen (D-N.H.), who serves as the ranking Democrat member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, announced the trip on March 28.

Sens. John Curtis (R-Utah), Thom Tillis (R-N.C.), and Jacky Rosen (D-Nev.) will join her on a trip to Taipei, Taiwan; Tokyo; and Seoul, South Korea, ahead of U.S. President Donald Trump’s May summit with Chinese leader Xi Jinping in Beijing.

The trip could cause friction with Chinese leadership, which opposes other countries having relations with Taiwan and sees such activities as a challenge to Beijing’s claim of sovereignty over the independent island.

While Taiwan is backed by the United States for its democracy, Trump’s recent floating of potential arms sales to Taiwan in discussions with Xi has highlighted implications about the future of U.S. policy toward the island.

“This bipartisan delegation demonstrates Congress’s commitment to these alliances and partnerships is unwavering and will endure well beyond any one administration,” Shaheen said in a statement.

The U.S. lawmakers are planning to meet with both political leaders and defense officials during their trip as a display of reassurance to the United States’s Asian allies.

“Our alliance with Taiwan is one of the most strategically and morally significant partnerships America has in the Indo-Pacific,” Curtis said in a statement.

Taiwan’s economic relationship with the United States has been a key concern for the Trump administration, as Washington relies on the island for computer chip production.

Taiwan’s semiconductor production drove a trade imbalance of nearly $127 billion during the first 11 months of 2025. In February, the Trump administration reached a deal with the island that removed 99 percent of its trade barriers with the United States.

A bipartisan group of U.S. lawmakers during a visit to Taiwan last year called for the United States to partner more closely with the self-governing island.

That trip resulted in conversations that were “optimistic and forward-looking,” Sen. Chris Coons (D-Del.) said at the time. Coons visited Taipei last April with Sens. Pete Ricketts (R-Neb.) and Ted Budd (R-N.C.).

There were also discussions about potential military action against Taiwan by China.

“Of course, there is the possibility that Xi Jinping would decide that this is the right time for the Chinese Communist Party to take aggressive action,” Coons said.

“I think it’s exactly the wrong thing for them to do. I think they would find a forceful and united response.”

Conservative states across the US have taken action in recent months to begin the arduous process of removing the stain of the woke movement from America’s streets and public buildings.  For the last decade, the far-left ideological crusade has left its mark everywhere while using “marginalized” identity groups as a moral shield. 

Though they claim to be acting as a civil rights movement, the reality is that “Pride” and LGBT activist groups are entirely political.  The pride flag is a political, ideological and some would argue religious symbol of cultural dominance planted across the country as a means to claim ownership.

The State of Idaho is no longer tolerating this insurgency. On Tuesday, Mayor Lauren McLean was forced to remove the Progress Pride flag from display in Downtown Boise after Governor Brad Little signed HB 561.  The bill, brought by Rep. Ted Hill, R-Eagle, limits local governments to flying only the American flag, state flags, official military flags, recognized tribal flags, and the official flag of an Idaho university or college. 

The response from Democrats has been dramatic, to say the least, with a somber proclamation of “Transgender Day” to mourn the loss of the pride flag.  Idaho also recently passed one of the strictest laws in the nation against transgenders using incorrect bathrooms and public facilities.    

Initial laws passed by the state in 2025 required that only “official flags” be flown on public land and government buildings.  However, McLean and city officials attempted to bypass the law by making the pride flag an “official” flag of Boise.  Governor Little closed the loophole and instituted fines of $2000 per day for those cities that refuse to cooperate.

Leftist officials held a bizarre ceremony for the removal of the pride flag, which once again shines a light on the cult-like nature of the woke movement. 

BREAKING: Boise mayor forced to take city hall’s LGBTQ+ flag down after law passes pic.twitter.com/PUdjgSgETf

— End Wokeness (@EndWokeness) March 31, 2026

Similar reactions have taken place in cities across the US where pride flag have been forced on the populace by city officials and were then removed by the state government.

Boise, Idaho, has flown a Pride flag outside City Hall for more than a decade, primarily during “Pride Month” in June and related events.  However, in the last four years under Democrat Mayor Lauren McClean, the flag has stayed flying year-round, often displayed alongside other flags like the U.S., Idaho, City of Boise, and POW/MIA flags.

The presence of radical left symbolism in the middle of one of the reddest states in the US is a reminder that there are progressive controlled cities and leftist activists everywhere.  They are not relegated to blue states, and unlike conservatives, they are highly aggressive in their efforts to claim territory and maintain power.

This is often expressed in the concept of “visibility”, which leftists mention often.  It’s the idea that the “rights” of activist groups are not being respected unless they are allowed to shove their political symbols in the faces of everyone on a regular basis. 

It’s not enough that the public tolerates these groups.  The public must be forced to see them at all times, until people accept their activist ideology as sacrosanct.  The best possible path forward for Americans is to do the opposite and erase woke visibility as much as possible.  Civil rights are not a free license to impose fringe ideological views on the rest of the population.

Authored by Steve Watson via Modernity.news,

Texas Congressman Keith Self has dropped a bombshell on the growing reality of Sharia-adherent communities taking root inside the United States. Far from some future hypothetical, these enclaves are here, now, and operating openly in his own district.

Self laid it out plainly: “Sharia is alive, well, and operating in Plano, Texas. Right now, as I speak, there is an existing Sharia-adherent enclave run by the East Plano Islamic Center in my congressional district. It’s been functioning for 12 years right in our midst. This is not a hypothetical or future threat. It is here, now and operational.”

He continued: “It is a parallel society, a de facto Sharia enclave operating in defiance of full assimilation into American law situated immediately adjacent to the very law enforcement facilities meant to protect our communities.”

Texas Congressman Keith Self confirms Muslims are practicing Sharia Law and building ‘Muslim only’ communities

He says Islamic Centers are being strategically planned next to our police training facilities

“Sharia is alive, well, and operating in Plano, Texas. Right now, as I… pic.twitter.com/iPXwPDsVmu

— Wall Street Apes (@WallStreetApes) March 31, 2026

The congressman highlighted a disturbing pattern: “Alarmingly, as a matter of fact, a pattern of Islamic centers being built next to police training facilities is emerging. There’s also one in Irving, Texas. Intimidation, is clearly the intent.”

Mass immigration without any expectation of assimilation has created no-go zones and parallel legal systems on U.S. soil. While open-borders globalists in Washington and blue-city mayors bend over backward to accommodate every cultural demand, everyday Americans are left watching their neighborhoods transform into something unrecognizable.

This Texas development fits the same pattern of demographic replacement and cultural takeover we’ve already highlighted recently in New York City. 

Overflowing mosques force hundreds of Muslim men to spill onto public sidewalks and streets for Friday prayers — blocking roads and turning working-class neighborhoods into scenes straight out of an Islamic nation. 

Back in February, a mass Ramadan prayer took over Times Square, complete with chants of “Allahu Akbar” echoing through one of America’s most iconic landmarks while thousands laid out prayer mats in the middle of the street. 

The message is crystal clear: what starts as “diversity” and “religious freedom” quickly becomes dominance. Public spaces get repurposed, local laws get ignored, and law enforcement finds itself staring down facilities deliberately built to send a message. 

Plano and Irving are not anomalies — they are the logical extension of years of unchecked migration and elite refusal to demand loyalty to American values.

Congressman Self’s exposure comes at a critical moment. With Trump in the White House and America First policies gaining ground, there is finally political will to confront these threats head-on. Mass deportations, strict assimilation requirements, and an end to sanctuary policies aren’t just good ideas — they are national security necessities. Parallel societies have no place in a sovereign republic.

The alternative is the slow erosion of the rule of law, one enclave at a time, until the country is unrecognizable. Texans — and Americans everywhere — are right to demand action before Sharia-adherent zones spread any further. This isn’t about faith; it’s about sovereignty. One nation, one set of laws. Anything less is surrender.

Your support is crucial in helping us defeat mass censorship. Please consider donating via Locals or check out our unique merch. Follow us on X @ModernityNews.

Authored by Jeffrey Tucker via The Epoch Times,

Sometimes it is just a mood. Sometimes it’s the store or the product. Regardless, I can hardly go to the grocery store these days without a sense of shock at how much I’m spending even while buying as little as possible.

Money-saving tactics—choosing cheaper venues, substituting products, just eating less—don’t seem to work anymore.

Grocery days used to be happy. Smiles all around. The bounty was all around us. We met people and had quick and charming conversations, even talking about recipes with strangers and making short introductions in line.

The bad mood from shopping started years ago—a year after COVID-19 pandemic lockdowns began, when prices started responding to the flood of newly printed money funding stimulus payments. The checkout line was filled with grumpy people wearing masks. People stopped talking with one another except to register shock. You left feeling like you had been pillaged.

Time healed that wound even though prices kept rising and predictably so. We all started making changes. Less eating out. No more restaurant cocktails, which had oddly doubled in price, because menu items are hard to change. We stopped shopping at the fancy stores and found the grittier venues. We joined wholesale shopper’s clubs and bought in bulk to save money.

This worked for a while to keep the bills down and the budget in check. There are so many money-saving tricks you can use, such as giving up products you never should have bought anyway and buying things such as vinegar and baking soda instead of branded junk. It’s shocking, once you look around the house, how profligate we’ve been during boom times.

All seemed like it was going to be OK after the inauguration in 2025, when price increases stopped and inflation fell dramatically. The prices of 2019 would never come back, of course. The dollar had lost some 30 percent of its valuation in a mere five years. Dealing with that psychologically wasn’t easy, but at least good times were coming. We could make up in income and salary what we’ve lost in purchasing power.

Those times seem to be at an end. Our money-saving tricks are not working anymore. Every once in a while, we like to sample what it was like in the old days and go out to dinner. The bill comes and the shock hits hard. It seems like we are paying twice what we did before all this chaos hit. What were we thinking getting those appetizers anyway, when we could have spent the same amount for 5 pounds of chicken at the store?

I had to check my sense against the empirical data. Sure enough, Truflation, which tracks price increases in real time, reveals that right now goods inflation is running close to 4 percent. Services and resources are on the rise too, having changed course from last year at this time.

Then I decided to check what industry was saying. Over three months, inflation for groceries is up by 2 percent. This is in addition to a 40 percent rise since 2019.

Maybe 2 percent increases since January don’t sound terrible. However, remember that to compare it to the way we usually measure inflation, we have to annualize that number. We also have to compound it because past prices are added to new ones.

The end result of what industry is currently reporting right now is an astounding 8.2 percent inflation rate in grocery prices alone. That’s more in keeping with what I saw. I would swear that I noticed the difference from just two weeks ago. It’s enough to make one’s heart race and wonder about the future.

Who is to blame? When I hear that businesses are gouging people, we should generally dismiss such claims. Of course businesses want to charge more, while the consumer wants to pay less. The price is the point of agreement between supply and demand. That’s just basic economics, something not well understood by media reporters and political activists.

There are a number of factors at work here. The driving force right now is higher gas prices adding dramatically to transportation costs. Groceries are particularly affected by this. Growers are anticipating a very difficult season. Petrol is hard to come by in Australia and Latin America now, and some nations are already rationing. Fertilizer prices have soared to the point at which farmers cannot afford it.

Futures markets understand this. Speculations about future prices are discounted to the present.

That’s a major factor, but also there is no more room left in pricing metrics to forestall price increases at the consumer end. Tariffs forced distributors onto the edge of profitability in any case. There is also renewed devaluation of the dollar taking place, as the inflation of the past five years had not entirely been squeezed through the tube.

It all adds up and hits everyone very hard. This is certainly a time for pulling back in every possible way. It is also a time to get a freezer for your home, even if it is a small one. Meat is certain to be rising in price at a dramatic rate in the coming months, even if the war somehow comes to an end, which does not seem likely for a long time. Even small apartments can viably store 50 pounds of meat in the freezer.

I cannot help but feel awful for restaurants. During the good times, people got used to eating out several times per week, even nightly. That is no longer viable except for the very rich. If you can get away with $50 per person you are very lucky. Twice that is more common. Many chains are shutting down, and many more will in the coming months.

When I was a kid, eating out in my family hardly ever happened. There were restaurants, of course, but far fewer. That was during the last great wave, and eating out was first to go. Home cooking was the norm for my generation, at the tail end of the baby boomers. I can easily adapt. It’s much harder for younger people who have never been taught cooking skills and never needed to economize. This is changing by necessity.

I’ve warned many times over several years of a second wave of inflation to match the trajectory of the 1970s. It seems to be unfolding now but with a perfect storm of factors: continued monetary devaluation, tariffs, exploding energy prices, supply chain breakages, and war. One steps back in amazement that the powers that be would have taken such risks with the American (and world) standard of living, but here we are.

Most people in what we once called the middle class have already pulled back dramatically. Homes are out of the question. People who can have dropped medical insurance by necessity and decided to embrace the risks. Travel plans have been canceled not only because of rising prices, but also because of uncertain wait times at airports, plus gas prices. With a new round of pummeling from grocery prices, we are now forced to take that final step into a seriously degraded standard of living, while increases in wages and salaries are out of the question right now.

There are fixes to all these problems, but politicians seem to have other priorities.

What is the outlook for the future? Only a year ago, I was optimistic. These days, not so much. My memories are returning of the values that shaped my grandmother’s life: saving pie pans, canning vegetables, and clipping coupons whenever possible. She was a great and happy woman shaped by the Great Depression, words we hoped would never apply to the times of our lives. And yet here we are.

Another notable Trump supporter has come out against the US-Israel war in Iran. In a candid and pointed monologue delivered on his syndicated radio show marking his 84th birthday, longtime conservative voice Michael Savage directly challenged President Donald Trump’s handling of the Iran conflict. Savage, a staunch America First advocate, did not mince words: “He [Trump] has good intentions. He liked to have no war. Now we have a war. He ran on the platform of no wars. And now we have a war. Who is whispering in his ear?”

“That’s not to say Iran is a good nation,” Savage continued. “We know the Mullahs are crazy and they live in the 7th century,” but pushed back strongly against the idea that military escalation is the solution, adding, “but maybe war isn’t the answer.”

He warned against the “stop them before it’s too late” mindset, invoking the famous The Godfather reference to the argument for stopping Hitler at Munich – and warning that bombing Iran may have severe unintended consequences.

“Do you ever think about that? What is to prevent Russia from finally saying I’m gonna join Iran in this war now? And Russia says they are going [to] send Russian troops into Iran to defend the Iranian soil. What if they do that? Is that stupid to think of?”

Savage also questioned the effectiveness of the strikes: “A year ago they were told their nuclear capacity was completely destroyed. What’s left for them to fight with? Well… Think by bombing them they’re going to stop?”

Savage Advice

“We appeal to President Trump – as I said for four weeks now – declare victory before it’s too late. But apparently nobody hears me.” 

“Nobody wanted this war. Everybody wants this war to end as quickly as possible. Anyone with a conscience knows that. Nobody’s buying the big lie.”

On his 84th birthday, Michael Savage come out against the war in Iran pic.twitter.com/mfnJ5osS61

— The_Real_Fly (@The_Real_Fly) April 1, 2026

Savage has been notably opposed to neoconservative foreign policy adventures. He was one of the earliest major conservative voices to turn against the Iraq War in the mid-2000s – famously prioritizing “Borders, Language, Culture” over endless Middle East entanglements – and has repeatedly criticized hawkish influences in Republican administrations. During Trump’s first term, Savage voiced strong opposition to John Bolton’s influence and U.S. strikes in Syria. In recent weeks leading up to his birthday remarks, Savage has repeatedly warned that the military is “out of control” and urged the administration to think through the ramifications of escalation.

Savage is far from alone among prominent conservative commentators raising similar concerns. Tucker Carlson has repeatedly warned that the Iran escalation betrays Trump’s “no new wars” campaign promise and has questioned who is pushing the administration toward conflict.
 

Tucker Carlson gives a “super simple” explanation for why Israel would want to drag America into a hot war with Iran.

“It’s hard to say this, but the United States didn’t make the decision here. Benjamin Netanyahu did.”

“This happened because Israel wanted it to happen. This is… pic.twitter.com/XECY7TkTjy

— The Vigilant Fox 🦊 (@VigilantFox) March 3, 2026

Megyn Kelly has publicly asked who “talked Trump into” the current path. Laura Ingraham has expressed doubts on air about the rush to broader war, while paleoconservative stalwart Pat Buchanan has long sounded alarms about neoconservative influence returning to the White House.

NEW: Megyn Kelly says the US service members who died in the war with Iran died for Iran or Israel, says she thinks the US is fighting Israel’s war.

“No one should have to die for a foreign country. I don’t think those four service members died for the United States.”

“I think… pic.twitter.com/WFtIErRNsA

— Collin Rugg (@CollinRugg) March 3, 2026

And of course, Trump attacked them for saying so. 

The divide highlights tension within the conservative movement between America First non-interventionists and those favoring a more aggressive stance toward Iran, such as Mark Levin.

At 84, Michael Savage remains as independent and outspoken as ever. His core question lingers: if President Trump campaigned so forcefully against new wars, then “Who is whispering in his ear?” — and why is that voice apparently louder than the millions of voters who expected a different approach.