Category: News
Colorado Forces Lawyers To Swear They Won’t Help Feds Nab Illegals
Colorado Forces Lawyers To Swear They Won’t Help Feds Nab Illegals
Lawyers in the Mile High State are now being strong-armed by Democrats into signing a radical anti-immigration-enforcement pledge just to do their jobs.
Starting March 30, 2026, every private attorney logging into Colorado’s official Courts E-Filing system (CCE) must certify – under penalty of perjury – that they will never use or share non-public personal information from court records to assist federal immigration authorities. Refuse? You’re shut out of the system entirely. No filing lawsuits, no checking case files, no representing clients in state court. Period.
The certification reads in part: “I certify under penalty of perjury that I will not use personal identifying information obtained from the database… for the purpose of investigating for, participating in, cooperating with, or assisting in federal immigration enforcement, including enforcement of civil immigration laws and 8 U.S.C. sec. 1325 or 1326, unless required by federal or state law or to comply with a court-issued subpoena, warrant, or order.”
Colorado is now requiring lawyers in the State, as a condition of logging into its court e-filing system, to promise not to cooperate with federal authorities in enforcing federal immigration law.
Please understand:
– I do not practice immigration law.
– I do not practice… pic.twitter.com/khYDf5TkQd
— Ian Speir (@IanSpeir) April 2, 2026
It’s not optional for immigration lawyers only. It hits every practicing attorney in Colorado – divorce attorneys, personal injury lawyers, estate planners, the works. Government employees get a free pass. Everyone else? Sign or sit on the sidelines.
The order comes straight from Senate Bill 25-276, the “Protect Civil Rights Immigration Status” act rammed through by Democrats and signed by Gov. Jared Polis on May 23, 2025. The bill expanded Colorado’s already aggressive sanctuary-style rules by slapping the Judicial Branch with the same restrictions as other state agencies – all in the name of blocking “federal civil immigration enforcement.”
The Colorado Judicial Branch openly admits the move is designed to keep state resources from helping ICE. On its official website, officials wrote: “This legislation seeks to prevent the use of state resources for federal civil immigration enforcement.” They even acknowledged the backlash, saying, “We recognize that some people may be frustrated by the requirements of this new legislation. However, the judiciary is required to comply with the laws as enacted by the legislature.”
Why isn’t this OBSTRUCTION of JUSTICE ⁉️ @TheJusticeDept https://t.co/BwJxmFwIJR
— Sidney Powell 🇺🇸 Attorney, Author, Gladiator (@SidneyPowell1) April 3, 2026
A brief version of the same popup appeared last September before being yanked for “further discussion.” Now it’s back for good.
Critics say the policy doesn’t just create a massive headache for lawyers trying to meet filing deadlines – it raises serious questions about compelled speech, access to the courts, and whether the state can force officers of the court to swear off cooperating with federal law on pain of professional paralysis.
I’ll be damned. I practice law here in Colorado as well. Just logged in. Here’s the text of their “announcement.” This is indefensible. pic.twitter.com/XPPIFHLasT
— Matt Barber (@ThatMattBarber) April 2, 2026
Colorado has positioned itself as one of the nation’s most defiant sanctuary states, repeatedly slapping limits on local cooperation with ICE. The new certification is just the latest example of Democrats putting ideology over basic functionality of the justice system.
This is blatantly illegal. https://t.co/R5auplUKRy
— Sean Davis (@seanmdav) April 2, 2026
A federal judge this week tossed a Trump administration lawsuit challenging some of these same policies, ruling the feds can’t force states to play along. But for thousands of Colorado lawyers just trying to file a motion or check a docket, the message from the state is crystal clear: Help enforce immigration laws? Not on our watch — and not in our courts.
Tyler Durden
Fri, 04/03/2026 – 20:45
https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/colorado-forces-lawyers-swear-they-wont-help-feds-nab-illegals
Micro AI Sentry Guns May Be Next Layer Of Defense For Data Centers Against Kamikaze Drones
Micro AI Sentry Guns May Be Next Layer Of Defense For Data Centers Against Kamikaze Drones
Submitted by Cameron Rowe, Co-Founder and CEO of Sentradel,
Most people don’t think about what the “cloud” actually is. It’s a physical building full of servers storing everything from your medical records to your social media. Every Google search, every ChatGPT query, every hospital pulling up your health history routes through a data center. Right now, those buildings have about as much aerial protection as your local Costco.
In March 2026, Iranian Shahed drones struck three AWS data centers in the UAE and Bahrain. Multiple availability zones went down simultaneously, taking core services like EC2, S3, and Lambda offline, cascading outages to banks, payment platforms, and ride-hailing apps across the region. It was the first confirmed kinetic attack on a hyperscale data center run by a U.S. company. Shortly after, Iranian state media published a list of “Enemy Technology Infrastructure,” including Microsoft, Google, and Oracle facilities, painting targets on every major cloud provider in contested regions.
Yes, the cloud is distributed. Workloads can fail over. But data still lives somewhere physical, and partial corruption or destruction can be devastating in ways a temporary outage doesn’t capture. Medical records, financial transactions, and AI training datasets are worth hundreds of millions. When those are gone, they’re gone.
Global data center capex is approaching $1 trillion in 2026. The top four hyperscalers are collectively spending nearly $600 billion on infrastructure this year. That’s the physical backbone of modern life, sitting behind chain-link fences, with no ability to stop a drone costing between $30,000 and $80,000.
These facilities were never built to survive military threats. Security was designed around physical intrusion and cyberattacks, not one-way attack drones that cost a fraction of what they destroy.
Decentralization helps at the margins, but hundreds of billions of dollars poured into existing mega facilities can’t be shifted overnight. The real answer is layered detection and intercept: radar, RF sensors, EO/IR tracking, and kinetic or electronic defeat systems working together around these sites.
Autonomous counter-drone system
Watch: Autonomous counter-drone system
The military may eventually provide coverage for the most critical nodes, but they’ll prioritize their own assets first. And human life should come before server racks. That’s exactly why data centers need to be more proactive about protecting their own infrastructure rather than waiting for someone else to do it. Sentradel is already marketing counter-drone solutions to data center operators; it’s likely to become more important over the next year as these kamikaze drones continue to improve rapidly in AI, speed, and payload.
Tyler Durden
Fri, 04/03/2026 – 20:00
February Net Trailer Orders Down 43% As Bookings Fall 26%
February Net Trailer Orders Down 43% As Bookings Fall 26%
Preliminary February net trailer orders fell by about 10,000 units from January’s 23,300, a 43% month-over-month decline, according to TheTrucker.com.
“Sequentially, a drop in net orders was expected, as the industry transitions from the strongest to the weakest order months of the annual cycle,” said Jennifer McNealy, director CV market research & publications at ACT Research.
“Trailer makers now will begin to take fewer orders and start to work down the backlog that grew during the peak of order season at the end of the previous year, which in this year’s cycle started and ended later than usual, as fleet decision-making hesitance into late 2025 delayed the cycle a bit and caused a high-side surprise in January.”
The report notes that February bookings totaled 13,200 units—26% lower than February 2025. After seasonal adjustment, orders come to 12,300 units. Final figures will be released later this month, with preliminary estimates typically within ±5% accuracy.
“We now question when we will see 20k-plus-unit order intake months again, and how quickly trailer OEMs will build down the still-thin backlog, particularly given concerns about the level of activity in the key freight-generating economic sectors that drive transportation demand,” McNealy said.
Tyler Durden
Fri, 04/03/2026 – 19:20
https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/february-net-trailer-orders-down-43-bookings-fall-26
FBI Issues Public Alert On Americans Using Foreign Apps
FBI Issues Public Alert On Americans Using Foreign Apps
Authored by Naveen Athrappully via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),
The FBI identified data security risks from foreign-developed mobile apps used in the United States, the agency warned in a March 31 public service announcement.
“As of early 2026, many of the most downloaded and top-grossing apps in the United States are developed and maintained by foreign companies, particularly those based in China,” the FBI said, without naming any apps.
“The apps that maintain digital infrastructure in China are subject to China’s extensive national security laws, enabling the Chinese government to potentially access mobile app users’ data.”
In the Google Play store, the most popular apps include short-form video platform TikTok, video editor CapCut, artificial intelligence video generator PixVerse, and communication app Telegram X. China-based ByteDance maintains ownership of TikTok and CapCut. PixVerse is owned by a Singaporean company, and the developer of Telegram X is based in the United Arab Emirates.
On Apple’s App Store, the top free apps include CapCut, TikTok, and Chinese shopping apps Temu and Shein.
In its alert, the FBI warned users to be aware of the types of data the foreign apps request access to when they are downloaded.
“When access is permitted by the user, the app can persistently collect data and users’ private information throughout the device, not just within the app or while the app is active,” the bureau said.
The privacy policy of an app, which can typically be accessed on the company website, reveals where the harvested data, including system prompts and personal info, are stored. Some of the apps store data in servers located in China. Some apps do not allow users to run them unless they consent to data sharing, the FBI said.
Certain apps offer options to invite friends or other contacts to use the apps. Once an app is downloaded, the default permissions may allow the developer to collect and store information about users’ names, email IDs, physical addresses, user IDs, and stored contacts’ phone numbers.
“Some apps may also contain malware that could collect data beyond what is authorized by the user. This could include malicious code and hard-to-remove malware designed to exploit known vulnerabilities in various operating systems and insert a backdoor for escalated privileges,” the agency said.
“Downloading apps from unfamiliar websites or third-party app stores runs a higher risk of embedding malware. Official apps stores scan for malicious content, lowering the risk of malware or malicious code on devices.”
The FBI advised people to disable unnecessary data sharing on apps, stick to downloading verified apps from official app stores, perform regular device software updates, and change passwords regularly.
U.S. authorities have taken action against Chinese apps that pose privacy risks to citizens.
In February, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton filed a lawsuit against Shein, stating: “Not only is Shein harming consumers with toxic synthetic materials, but it’s also exposing Americans’ data to Communist China. This must come to an end.”
The same month, Paxton sued Temu over suspected ties to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).
In 2025, President Donald Trump issued an executive order for the United States to acquire TikTok from Chinese parent company ByteDance. In January, a deal was finalized that set up a U.S. majority-owned joint venture to oversee TikTok’s American operations.
AI, VPN Risks
In 2025, Florida Chief Financial Officer Jimmy Patronis banned the Chinese artificial intelligence model DeepSeek from the state’s Department of Financial Services. New York and Texas also banned DeepSeek from state government devices and networks last year.
“Texas will not allow the Chinese Communist Party to infiltrate our state’s critical infrastructure through data-harvesting AI and social media apps,” Texas Gov. Greg Abbott said at the time. “Texas will continue to protect and defend our state from hostile foreign actors.”
In a June 2025 report, the Tech Transparency Project, a research initiative that seeks to hold big tech companies accountable, warned that Apple and Google app stores were allowing virtual private networks (VPNs) owned by Chinese companies on their platforms, thus presenting security risks.
“Chinese-owned VPNs raise serious privacy and security concerns for Americans because Chinese companies can be forced to share user data with the Chinese government under the country’s national security laws,” the report warned. “VPNs have access to particularly sensitive user data since they see all of a person’s web activity.”
Earlier this year, Republican lawmakers introduced the Securing Federal Devices from Chinese Applications Act to block apps controlled by the CCP from U.S. government devices, according to a Jan. 16 statement from the office of Rep. Jefferson Shreve (R-Ind.).
“If an app is controlled by the CCP, it does not belong on a U.S. government device,” Shreve said. “This bill shuts the door on CCP spyware and makes clear the federal government will not aid China’s surveillance state.”
Tyler Durden
Fri, 04/03/2026 – 18:40
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/fbi-issues-public-alert-americans-using-foreign-apps
High Taxes, Power Bill Crisis Send Maryland Gov. Moore’s Poll Numbers To Record Low
High Taxes, Power Bill Crisis Send Maryland Gov. Moore’s Poll Numbers To Record Low
Left-wing Maryland Gov. Wes Moore’s approval rating has slid to a new record low as the Democrat darling, seen as Soros-friendly and as having aspirations to become the Democratic Party’s 2028 nominee, increasingly looks dimmer by the month.
Moore and Alex Soros.
Moore’s approval rating tumbled to 48% for the first time since he took office two years ago, as the Democratic Party is likely freaking out that even in one of the bluest states in America, ruled by the kings and queens of the progressive party in a one-party fashion, their rising star (now sinking star) is seeing mounting voter backlash as the state descends into multiple crises, from a fisical mess to power bills to crime and even a massive exodus of residents.
High taxes breaking the pocketbooks of working poor, horrible leadership, dishonesty, terrible fiscal management by the state, and the power bill crisis are the top reasons for the growing resentment captured in the new UMBC poll, which surveyed 804 Marylanders in mid-March, 731 of whom indicated they were registered voters.
In October 2024 and February 2025 polls, Moore’s approval ratings stood around 52%. In another October 2024 poll, he had a rating of around 54%.
Last Thursday, Moore was greeted with a stadium full of boos at Camden Yards on Opening Day for Orioles baseball. At the time, we noted that this was one of the clearest indicators of growing backlash against a governor operating under the failed Democratic Party framework, which is sending the state into financial ruin, and risks creating an ‘Illinois 2.0.’
Gov. Wes Moore was booed by the crowd ahead of the Orioles home opener on Thursday. https://t.co/KdJaF2jx68 pic.twitter.com/pA0p6G2z8m
— FOX Baltimore (@FOXBaltimore) March 26, 2026
“I am not surprised he was booed, given his poor job performance. He raised our taxes to record levels, blew through a $5 billion budget surplus, increased state spending to record levels, assaulted local control over zoning matters, and made our streets less safe by ending cooperation with ICE and allowing violent illegal immigrants to roam our streets,” said Republican council candidate, State Delegate Nino Mangione.
He added, “Wes Moore is, without question, the worst governor in the history of Maryland. I am not surprised he was booed. The boos were well deserved.”
Local outlet Fox Baltimore noted, “The governor’s approval numbers mark a double-digit decline in public polling since the first-term Democrat took office almost four years ago. Previous surveys show approval ratings in the mid-50s and low 60s.”
Maryland is a one-party-ruled state of Democratic kings and queens, where Republicans are nonexistent in any sizeable political power, which has resulted in absolutely no balance and no accountability. The financial implosion in the state, sparking a mass exodus of residents and multiple other crises, is the direction Democrats have proudly chosen, driven by a failed woke framework under the governor.
Republican State Delegate Robin Grammer Jr. said, “Moore’s approval rating is tanking because he is destroying Maryland’s middle class, chasing retirees from our state and making the American Dream impossible for our youth.”
We have spoken with the heads of local financial institutions and wealth advisors who have been strategizing with their high-net-worth clients about leaving the state since Moore took office. The decline of Maryland is a byproduct of one-party rule by the Democratic Party’s DEI leadership… but betting markets remain convinced…
…no matter how bad it gets?
Tyler Durden
Fri, 04/03/2026 – 18:00
It’s Past Time To Privatize The Post Office
It’s Past Time To Privatize The Post Office
Submitted by QTR’s Fringe Finance
A new piece from the Cato Institute lays out how bad things have gotten at the post office, arguing that the United States Postal Service is facing a severe and worsening financial crisis. According to the article, USPS has been losing billions of dollars annually for well over a decade and is now at a point where it cannot realistically fix its problems without major structural changes. I could have told you this after the horror show I lived through at the post office back in September of 2025.
The USPS now is the predictable outcome of trying to run a massive logistics operation through a government bureaucracy that moves slowly, resists change, and answers more to politics than to performance. The piece makes clear that USPS was built for a world that no longer exists, yet it continues operating as if nothing has changed because, as usual, government institutions are the last to notice reality.
The problems outlined are extensive and, frankly, not surprising. Mail volumes have collapsed as Americans switched to faster, cheaper digital alternatives, yet USPS continues to behave like it’s still 1995. What mail remains is increasingly dominated by low-value marketing material, while the agency struggles to compete in package delivery against companies that actually specialize in logistics.
Even Amazon, a company that started as an online bookstore (what could be less efficient to ship than godd*mn books — bricks?), has figured out how to build a better delivery network.
Meanwhile, visits to post offices have fallen off a cliff, but the system has barely shrunk its footprint. Labor costs remain enormous, productivity lags, and the workforce is structured in ways that prioritize stability over efficiency.
The result is exactly what you would expect when there is no real pressure to perform: bitchy apathetic staff, declining output, rising inefficiency, and billions in annual losses that just keep piling up. In the private sector, that kind of performance would trigger a full-scale overhaul or bankruptcy.
In government, it triggers a Congressional hearing and maybe a strongly worded memo, in addition to switching the Postmaster General and paying the new guy even more than the last guy got paid.
This is why privatization is not some radical idea but a logical response to a system that clearly is not working. A privatized USPS would finally be allowed to operate like a business instead of a political artifact. It could close unprofitable locations without needing a congressional debate, adjust delivery schedules based on actual demand, and invest in technology that improves service instead of maintaining outdated systems because “that’s how it’s always been done.”
Most importantly, it would have to make money (or at least stop losing it) which is a constraint that tends to focus the mind in ways government management never quite experiences. When survival depends on efficiency, organizations tend to discover it very quickly.
The contrast with private carriers like FedEx and UPS could not be clearer. These companies operate in a world where excuses don’t pay the bills. They optimize routes, invest in automation, analyze data, and constantly refine their operations because if they don’t, their competitors will. They have built systems that deliver packages faster, track them more precisely, and adapt to changing demand almost in real time. None of this happened because a committee approved it after years of debate. It happened because the profit motive demands results.
Meanwhile, USPS is stuck navigating layers of regulation and political oversight, where even obvious changes can take years to implement, if they happen at all.
🔥 50% OFF FOR LIFE: Using this coupon entitles you to 50% off an annual subscription to Fringe Finance for life: Get 50% off forever
There is also the small matter of accountability. Private companies cannot run losses indefinitely and expect someone else to quietly cover the gap. They either fix the problem or they go under. USPS, on the other hand, operates with the understanding that there will always be some form of backstop, explicit or not. That safety net removes urgency and allows inefficiencies to persist far longer than they would anywhere else. It is the classic government model: spend more, deliver less, and call it a “challenge” instead of a failure. Privatization would replace that dynamic with one where performance actually matters, where bad decisions have consequences, and where efficiency is not optional.
Of course, defenders of the status quo often argue that privatization would undermine public service, but that assumes the current system is delivering high-quality service to begin with. Other countries have already shown that it is possible to maintain universal delivery while still operating under private or semi-private models. Targeted subsidies can ensure rural access without requiring the entire system to function inefficiently. The difference is that those systems are designed around outcomes, not inertia.
At some point, it becomes difficult to ignore the obvious. Government agencies are notoriously bad at adapting, innovating, or even cutting costs, because they are not structured to do any of those things well. The USPS is not an exception; it is a textbook example. Continuing down the current path means more losses, more inefficiency, and more attempts to patch over structural problems with temporary fixes. Privatization, by contrast, offers a way to align incentives with reality, bringing the postal system into the same competitive, performance-driven environment that has already transformed the rest of the logistics industry. And if that means admitting that the government is not particularly good at running a nationwide delivery business, that is less a controversial statement than an overdue acknowledgment of what the evidence has been showing for years.
QTR’s Disclaimer: Please read my full legal disclaimer on my About page here. This post represents my opinions only. In addition, please understand I am an idiot and often get things wrong and lose money. I may own or transact in any names mentioned in this piece at any time without warning. Contributor posts and aggregated posts have been hand selected by me, have not been fact checked and are the opinions of their authors. They are either submitted to QTR by their author, reprinted under a Creative Commons license with my best effort to uphold what the license asks, or with the permission of the author.
This is not a recommendation to buy or sell any stocks or securities, just my opinions. I often lose money on positions I trade/invest in. I may add any name mentioned in this article and sell any name mentioned in this piece at any time, without further warning. None of this is a solicitation to buy or sell securities. I may or may not own names I write about and are watching. Sometimes I’m bullish without owning things, sometimes I’m bearish and do own things. Just assume my positions could be exactly the opposite of what you think they are just in case. If I’m long I could quickly be short and vice versa. I won’t update my positions. All positions can change immediately as soon as I publish this, with or without notice and at any point I can be long, short or neutral on any position. You are on your own. Do not make decisions based on my blog. I exist on the fringe. If you see numbers and calculations of any sort, assume they are wrong and double check them. I failed Algebra in 8th grade and topped off my high school math accolades by getting a D- in remedial Calculus my senior year, before becoming an English major in college so I could bullshit my way through things easier.
The publisher does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information provided in this page. These are not the opinions of any of my employers, partners, or associates. I did my best to be honest about my disclosures but can’t guarantee I am right; I write these posts after a couple beers sometimes. I edit after my posts are published because I’m impatient and lazy, so if you see a typo, check back in a half hour. Also, I just straight up get shit wrong a lot. I mention it twice because it’s that important.
Tyler Durden
Fri, 04/03/2026 – 17:20
https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/its-past-time-privatize-post-office
Tiger Woods Flexes Call With Trump Before DUI Arrest; Pardon Odds Remain Low
Tiger Woods Flexes Call With Trump Before DUI Arrest; Pardon Odds Remain Low
Bodycam footage shows Tiger Woods telling local authorities on Jupiter Island that he spoke with President Trump shortly after he flipped his Land Rover SUV and was arrested for DUI.
“You got it. Thank you, bye… I was just talking to the President,” Woods told a local police officer seen in the bodycam footage. The officer was asking Woods to remain on the scene. Bodycam video was obtained by the New York Post.
Tiger Woods flexes his call with Trump to law enforcement after DUI:
“You got it. Thank you, bye… I was just talking to the President.” pic.twitter.com/El9GDw6SWJ
— Headquarters (@HQNewsNow) April 3, 2026
Last Friday, Woods crashed his Land Rover into another vehicle, resulting in his $100,000-plus SUV turning onto its driver’s side.
Unfortunately for Woods, he failed a on-scene sobriety test administered by police after what they say he showed “signs of impairment” and appeared “lethargic.” Woods blew “triple-zeroes” on a breathalyzer but failed to submit a urine test.
Woods told officers he was “hoping to” play in the upcoming Masters Tournament, but in a statement posted on X on Tuesday, he told the golfing world that he would pause tournament play for the foreseeable future and “seek treatment.”
“I know and understand the seriousness of the situation I find myself in today. I am stepping away for a period of time to seek treatment and focus on my health. This is necessary in order for me to prioritize my well-being and work toward lasting recovery,” Woods stated (or perhaps his layer stated).
A new Polymarket bet, “Will Trump pardon Tiger Woods by June 30?” showed about a 6% chance as of Friday around lunchtime that the pro golfer would be pardoned by Trump.
Woods admitted he took “a few pills” before the crash. Officers also found hydrocodone pills at the crash scene.
This incident marks the second DUI in the Jupiter Island area over the last decade.
Will Trump pardon Tiger Woods? Polymarket is already taking bets…
Tyler Durden
Fri, 04/03/2026 – 16:40
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/tiger-woods-flexes-call-trump-dui-arrest-pardon-odds-remain-low
DOJ Is Done Releasing Epstein Files
DOJ Is Done Releasing Epstein Files
Authored by Steve Watson via modernity.news,
In a move sparking fresh skepticism among Americans demanding full accountability, the new acting Attorney General Todd Blanche has declared the Jeffrey Epstein files chapter closed. This came just hours after President Trump reassigned Pam Bondi, with Blanche – Trump’s former personal attorney – stepping in as acting AG and signaling it’s time to move on from the scandal.
“The DOJ has now released ALL the files with respect to the Epstein saga,” Blanche stated on Fox News. He added, “I think that to the extent the Epstein files was a part of the past year of this Justice Department, it should not be a part of anything going forward.”
Jesse Watters pressed Blanche directly on whether he thought Bondi mishandled the Epstein files. Blanche responded, “First of all, I have never heard President Trump say that the Attorney General was, that anything that happened to her had anything to do with the Epstein files. So look, the Epstein files has been a saga that’s lasted for the entire for the past year.” He further defended the process, noting that Bondi and he “appeared in front of Congress voluntarily a couple weeks ago to answer any questions they had” and made documents available for review.
🚨 IT’S OFFICIAL: The Epstein Files are DONE, acting AG Todd Blanche announces
“The DOJ has now released ALL the files with respect to the Epstein saga.”pic.twitter.com/dT9dLvoASd
— Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh) April 3, 2026
When Watters asked, “Who was Epstein spying for?” Blanche replied, “I don’t know that he was spying for anybody. Nobody’s ever said that.” He claimed there is “no evidence in the Epstein files” suggesting Epstein worked for a foreign country.
Todd Blanche wastes no time covering up for the Epstein child trafficking network and says he has no idea which country Jeffrey Epstein was working for or spying for.
He says there is no evidence in the Epstein files that proves Epstein was a spy.
JESSE WATTERS: Who was Epstein… pic.twitter.com/EtyHPLakVN
— Shadow of Ezra (@ShadowofEzra) April 3, 2026
On the question of releasing names of men who abused girls, Blanche previously pushed back, asking “What does that mean? I don’t understand what that means.” He also stated plainly, “It’s not a crime to party with Mr. Epstein.”
Reporter: Will we learn the identities of the men in the Epstein files?
Todd Blanche, Trump’s Attorney General: “What does that mean?”
🤬It means: Who raped children, who enabled it, and who’s still being shielded?
Stop pretending the question is unclear. The cover-up is the… pic.twitter.com/i6nGtX9P74
— Truthseeker (@Xx17965797N) April 3, 2026
Blanche doubled down on the administration’s position: “When Trump said let’s release the Epstein files… we did it.”
The timing aligns with Trump’s decision to move Bondi to the private sector amid reported frustrations over her pace on key matters, including the Epstein files. Critics had highlighted her earlier claims of possessing a client list and distributing repetitive binders, followed by a DOJ memo stating no such list existed.
Yet the assertion that “all files” are out faces immediate pushback. The DOJ reviewed roughly six million potentially responsive documents but released only about 3.5 million publicly, leaving millions still unreleased, redacted, or withheld.
This latest development deepens concerns over an Epstein cover up. FBI officers have raised alarms, with suspicions of document shredding after his death.
Separately, a foreign hacker who cracked into the FBI’s Epstein files in 2023 was reportedly disgusted at the scale of child sexual abuse material uncovered, underscoring how much sensitive content may still remain hidden.
Epstein survivor reactions and ongoing victim calls for transparency continue to highlight the stakes.
Annie Farmer, a survivor of Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, reacts to President Trump firing Pam Bondi as U.S. attorney general. Trump said Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche will be acting attorney general. pic.twitter.com/MrysNjbVOA
— CBS News (@CBSNews) April 2, 2026
Blanche has remained guarded on specifics. His responses often circled back to congressional access rather than new public disclosures, while emphasizing a pivot to other fraud cases nationwide.
The Epstein operation represented far more than one man’s crimes — it exposed a network that reached the highest levels of power, protected for years by institutional gatekeepers. Declaring the files “done” while millions of pages stay locked away does little to rebuild trust in a system long accused of shielding the elite.
Americans who supported Trump’s mandate expect genuine sunlight on these matters, not a premature shutdown dressed as completion. The deep state’s habits of concealment die hard, and the demand for full disclosure — for the victims and the public’s right to know — will not fade quietly.
Your support is crucial in helping us defeat mass censorship. Please consider donating via Locals or check out our unique merch. Follow us on X @ModernityNews.
Tyler Durden
Fri, 04/03/2026 – 16:00
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/doj-done-releasing-epstein-files
Hegseth: Military Bases Are No Longer Gun-Free Zones
Hegseth: Military Bases Are No Longer Gun-Free Zones
Authored by Catherine Salgado via PJMedia.ocm,
Secretary of War Pete Hegseth has overturned the controversial rule banning firearms from military installations.
Up until now, it was nearly impossible for servicemen to obtain permission to carry personal firearms on military posts and bases. That is about the change.
“Not all enemies are foreign, nor are they all outside our borders,” said Hegseth in an April 2 video.
“Some are domestic. Confirming your God-given right to self protection is what I’m signing into action today. And I’m proud to do so.”
Our military installations have been turned into gun-free zones—leaving our service members vulnerable and exposed.
That ends today. pic.twitter.com/IQ204YepZ0
— Secretary of War Pete Hegseth (@SecWar) April 2, 2026
There have been multiple murders or mass casualty events on bases in the last decade, numerous drone incursions on military property, and a growing trend of foreigners breaching military bases, so there is good reason to think servicemen should be able to carry firearms on installations. Besides which, the overwhelming majority of mass shootings occur in gun-free zones. But Hegseth above all based his argument on the Constitution.
“Our great republic was founded on a simple yet bold idea: our rights, as citizens, are not granted to us by government, but instead, by God,” the secretary said.
“250 years ago, the Revolutionary War was fought to secure our God-given rights. The Second Amendment to our Constitution enshrines the right of all citizens to carry weapons to protect themselves, their families, and their fellow countrymen.”
And if any citizens can be trusted with guns, Hegseth argued, it is servicemen.
“The War Department’s uniformed service members are trained at the highest and unwavering standards. These war fighters, entrusted with the safety of our nation, are no less entitled to exercise their God-given right to keep and bear arms than any other American,” he emphasized.
Indeed, Hegseth stated, “Our warfighters defend the right of others to carry, they should be able to carry themselves. Recent events like what happened at Fort Stewart, Holloman Air Force Base, or Pensacola Naval Air Station have made clear that some threats are closer to home than we would like.”
In 2019, a member of the Royal Saudi Air Force committed a terrorist attack at Pensacola’s Naval Air Station that killed three sailors and injured multiple others. In August 2025, Sgt. Quornelius Radford shot five fellow soldiers at Georgia’s Fort Stewart. Most recently, on March 17, civilian Ashanti Stewart killed herself after shooting and injuring a service member at Holloman Air Force Base in New Mexico.
Hegseth reflected, “In these instances, minutes are a lifetime. And our service members have the courage and training to make those precious short minutes count. Before today, it was virtually impossible — most people probably don’t know this — it was virtually impossible for War Department personnel to get permission to carry and store their own personal weapons, aligned with the state laws where we operate our installations. I mean, effectively, our bases across the country were gun free zones, unless you’re training, or unless you are a military policeman, you couldn’t carry.”
That is a potentially dangerous state of affairs, Hegseth argued. “You couldn’t bring your own firearm for your own personal protection onto post. Well, that’s no longer. The memo I’m signing today directs installation commanders to allow requests for personal protection, to carry a privately owned firearm, with the presumption that it is necessary for personal protection.”
He clarified, “If a request is for some reason denied, the reason for that denial will be in writing and will explain in detail the basis for that direction. Again, the presumption is, service members will be able to have their Second Amendment right on post.”
That way, if there are more attempted terrorists and mass shooters, servicemen will have their personal firearms ready.
Tyler Durden
Fri, 04/03/2026 – 15:00
https://www.zerohedge.com/military/hegseth-military-bases-are-no-longer-gun-free-zones
Trump Proposes $1.5 Trillion In War Spending, ‘Largest In Decades’
Trump Proposes $1.5 Trillion In War Spending, ‘Largest In Decades’
US President Donald Trump is asking Congress to boost military spending to $1.5 trillion for 2027, the largest such request in decades, while demanding cuts to domestic spending on social programs, AP reported Friday.
The White House released details of the desired spending increase on Friday as part of Trump’s 2027 budget proposal. The proposal comes amid the US-Israeli war on Iran, which is costing US taxpayers over $11 billon for each week it continues.
Last month, the Pentagon proposed receiving an additional $200 billion to backfill munitions and supplies used in the war, which has killed 3,527 Iranians, including 1,606 civilians and at least 244 children.
While the White House is demanding huge sums for war, Trump’s proposal would reduce non-defense spending by 10 percent, primarily by shifting some responsibility for social programs to state and local governments.
“We’re fighting wars. We can’t take care of day care,” Trump said at a private White House event on Wednesday. “It’s not possible for us to take care of day care, Medicaid, Medicare – all these individual things,” he said. “They can do it on a state basis. You can’t do it on a federal.”
According to AP, “The president’s annual budget more broadly is considered a reflection of the administration’s values,” but does not carry the force of law.
For Trump’s spending proposal to take effect, Congress would have to approve it. The US is already heavily in debt, with the federal government spending nearly $2 trillion more than it receives in tax receipts each year. This year, the national debt surpassed $39 trillion, while the debt-to-Gross Domestic Product (GDP) ratio now exceeds 120 percent, surpassing the peak reached after World War II.
While Trump ran for president on a platform of ending US wars abroad and putting the needs of US citizens first, he has instead prioritized initiating foreign wars in support of Israel’s project to expand its hegemony and territory in West Asia.
The war on Iran is providing a boon to US and Israeli weapons firms, who stand to earn hundreds of billions in additional profits. After meeting with major defense contractors at the White House in early March, Trump said the companies had agreed to quadruple production of “exquisite” and sophisticated defense systems that can repel ballistic missile attacks, such as Patriot missile batteries and Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) interceptors.
Each THAAD interceptor missile costs roughly $12.7 million, and each Patriot PAC-3 interceptor costs about $3.7 million. The interceptors have been used in large quantities to intercept Iran’s retaliatory missile and drone attacks on Israel and US bases in the Gulf.
Among the weapons firms that stand to benefit most from the war are RTX (Raytheon), which makes Tomahawk missiles; Boeing, which builds F-15 and Growler warplanes; and Lockheed Martin, which produces F-35 warplanes and Patriot and THAAD interceptors.
Other firms that benefit include Northrop Grumman, which builds B-2 stealth bombers and radar technology; General Dynamics, which produces submarines, bombs, and warheads for missiles; and L3/Harris, which makes solid rocket motors for THAAD missiles and electronics and sensors for reconnaissance aircraft.
US defense stocks have rallied strongly since February 2022, when Russia invaded Ukraine. Israel’s genocide of Palestinians in Gaza starting on 7 October 2023 provided an additional boost, as did the US and Israeli war on Iran in June of last year and the anticipation of the second US-Israeli war on the Islamic Republic that began in February.
* * *
Tyler Durden
Fri, 04/03/2026 – 13:30
https://www.zerohedge.com/military/trump-proposes-15-trillion-war-spending-largest-decades












